Skip to main content

The Daily Beast: "Is J.J. Abrams Too Big for TV?"

Sci-fi auteur Abrams' latest TV show, Undercovers, has gotten the axe at NBC.

Over at The Daily Beast, I take look at what went wrong and why TV needs a fully-committed, not watered down, Abrams in my latest feature, "Is J.J. Abrams Too Big for TV?"

Do you agree with my assessment? Did you try to watch Undercovers? Do you miss the days of Lost, Alias, and Felicity? Should Abrams be more committed to these television endeavors even as his feature film career skyrockets? Or is it a case of over-committing, audience expectations, or creative partnerships? Head to the comments section to discuss.

Comments

Page48 said…
JJ Abrams has lost touch with his constituents.

Just listen (read) to the pablum spewing from his mouth in this 2008 article appearing in "Variety" when he was out drumming up support for his new show, "Fringe".

He throws "Alias" under the bus, implying that he will never again treat his viewers so shabbily as he did with that show (his best, IMO). From now on, it's all standalone, easy to follow TV for the glassy-eyed, casual viewing masses.

This is why "Fringe" was so incredibly uninspiring until midway through S2, when the dreaded procedural formula began to give way to a more serialized, mythology-laden approach, just in the nick of time.

I believe that "Undercovers" was exactly what JJ wanted it to be...the 1980's revisited, which supports my theory that, at least when it comes to guaging TV audiences, JJ Abrams has done lost the plot. How or why NBC could be duped into thinking this was a winner is beyond me.

"Alias", "Lost", and to a lesser degree, "Fringe", are the kind of shows he does best and he strays from the sci-fi serial dramas at his own peril.

Perhaps, the early and richly deserved demise of "Undercovers" will be a "teachable moment" for JJ.
Chris L said…
I think J.J. is talented enough to make a successful show that doesn't have to be a sci-fi serial. I just think he needs to be more involved with it. There's not many people around that can take his "vision" and make it happen. After all, look what happened after he stepped aside on Lost. We got an unbalanced season 2 and a season 3 that was "way out there". It was a while before Damon and Carlton could get things back on course. (And I'm still not happy with the ending!!)

What I'm saying is that, J.J. needs to be more involved in the show making process if he wants to connect with his audience properly. There is only one J.J. Abrams, and there aren't many good substitutes.

It's clear that he wants to do more television. But he also clearly wants to do movies. He's very good at both, but he can't do both. And these lackluster shows with his name stamped on them is a result of that.

Popular posts from this blog

Katie Lee Packs Her Knives: Breaking News from Bravo's "Top Chef"

The android has left the building. Or the test kitchen, anyway. Top Chef 's robotic host Katie Lee Joel, the veritable "Uptown Girl" herself (pictured at left), will NOT be sticking around for a second course of Bravo's hit culinary competition. According to a well-placed insider, Joel will "not be returning" to the show. No reason for her departure was cited. Unfortunately, the perfect replacement for Joel, Top Chef judge and professional chef Tom Colicchio, will not be taking over as the reality series' host (damn!). Instead, the show's producers are currently scouring to find a replacement for Joel. Top Chef 's second season was announced by Bravo last month, but no return date has been set for the series' ten-episode sophomore season. Stay tuned as this story develops. UPDATE (6/27): Bravo has now confirmed the above story .

Have a Burning Question for Team Darlton, Matthew Fox, Evangeline Lilly, or Michael Emerson?

Lost fans: you don't have to make your way to the island via Ajira Airways in order to ask a question of the creative team or the series' stars. Televisionary is taking questions from fans to put to Lost 's executive producers/showrunners Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse and stars Matthew Fox ("Jack Shephard"), Evangeline Lilly ("Kate Austen"), and Michael Emerson ("Benjamin Linus") for a series of on-camera interviews taking place this weekend. If you have a specific question for any of the above producers or actors from Lost , please leave it in the comments section below . I'll be accepting questions until midnight PT tonight and, while I can't promise I'll be able to ask any specific inquiry due to the brevity of these on-camera interviews, I am looking for some insightful and thought-provoking questions to add to the mix. So who knows: your burning question might get asked after all.

What's Done is Done: The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil on the Season Finale of "Lost"

Every story begins with thread. It's up to the storyteller to determine just how much they need to parcel out, what pattern they're making, and when to cut it short and tie it off. With last night's penultimate season finale of Lost ("The Incident, Parts One and Two"), written by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, we began to see the pattern that Lindelof and Cuse have been designing towards the last five seasons of this serpentine series. And it was only fitting that the two-hour finale, which pushes us on the road to the final season of Lost , should begin with thread, a loom, and a tapestry. Would Jack follow through on his plan to detonate the island and therefore reset their lives aboard Oceanic Flight 815 ? Why did Locke want to kill Jacob? What caused The Incident? What was in the box and just what lies in the shadow of the statue? We got the answers to these in a two-hour season finale that didn't quite pack the same emotional wallop of previous seas