Skip to main content

The Weight of a Secret: Truth and Clues on Fringe

"Some Pandora's boxes are better left unopened." - Olivia Dunham

Secrets are funny things.

On the one hand, secrets are admissions of sort to an inner circle of trust; knowledge is, after all, power and knowing a secret gives one enormous sway over another. But that's also a hefty responsibility to shoulder: to carry around the weight of knowledge, to feel the pressure from such an onus.

On this week's episode Fringe ("Olivia. In the Lab. With the Revolver."), Agent Olivia Dunham is feeling that weight digging into her subsconcious. In learning the truth about Peter, she's become, in a way, complicit in Walter's betrayal of Peter, agreeing to carry the guilt of what he's done to his son, to perpetuate the fraud that's been perpetuated for decades.

Despite Olivia's vast reserves of strength, it's proving to be a burden that she doesn't want to shoulder any longer. She heard Walter's shocking confession in last week's episode ("Peter"), but instead of granting her a sense of solidarity with Walter Bishop, it's resulting in a splintering of the makeshift family the Fringe Division has established.

It's also ripped her apart from Peter Bishop just as they were possibly about to embark on a romantic journey together. Which, to me anyway, is a good thing: I much prefer these two as spiritual kinsmen than lovers. They had their moment to connect in a romantic sense and they missed it, particularly after Olivia discovered the truth about Peter's identity.

That knowledge has pushed the two of them apart and has had Olivia behaving extremely aloof and shifty towards Peter. I was glad to see Peter attempt to address the sudden distance between them with the scene in the car, though he believed that the cause of it was their almost-kiss in Jacksonville. Given what Olivia knows, being around Peter is just too painful and too fraught with complication. But I was happy to see them acknowledge the fact that they've grown fond of the weird little family they've built together and neither one of them wants to jeopardize that: not Peter for the promise of a relationship with Olivia... or Olivia by attempting to tell Peter the truth.

While Olivia must come face to face with a bizarre mystery that connects to her own shadowy childhood, she's also attempting to come to grips with what Walter did to her as a child, a fact that's clouding her judgment when it comes to Peter as well. Her inability to sleep does point to the fact that she's ambivalent about what she should do regarding keeping this secret. Is it better to tell the truth for the sake of telling the truth? Or do some truths more hurtful than others?

Nina was right that Olivia didn't go to Massive Dynamic to demand information that she didn't have (and Nina was telling her truth based on that final scene between Nina and Broyles) nor did she go there to warn her that she was going to expose Walter's secret. No, she was there so that Nina could talk her out of it and therefore free her from the feelings of guilt she was experiencing in keeping the truth buried. After all, her job is to expose the truth, to punish the wicked, and to protect the innocent. In colluding with Walter to keep Peter's identity under wraps, she is failing her own basic calling.

Or at least that's what Olivia is wondering about. In reality, she'd be shattering Peter's world forever and that's not her right to do so. I loved the scene between Olivia and Walter as both of them revealed that they had each changed their mind about how to proceed: Olivia had understood that no good would come from telling Peter and Walter that he had to face up to the consequences of his action, no matter what the outcome. Peter has a right to know about his identity and Walter's efforts to take control of his secret and to share the truth with Peter is a remarkable tipping point for the character. The past, after all, never stays buried... So why not be the one to do the digging yourself?

I'm glad that the writers have kept Kevin Corrigan's Sam Weiss in the picture. It's nice to see Olivia have an outlet outside of the Fringe Division, particularly since the death of Charlie Francis, and Sam is a quirky and intriguing character. The little spark between them--their easy rapport and the fact that Sam turned up in the middle of the night with Clue--is a great change of pace for the series. I'm not sure where their storyline is going but I'm completely invested in their friendship and hope that Corrigan sticks around for a while.

Likewise, I'm also glad that Nina Sharp is being pulled further back into the main focus of the series. Nina's hung around for far too long on the, er, fringes of the series and was too often relegated to the periphery. Instead, she should be a valuable--if shifty--ally for the Fringe Division. The aforementioned scene with Broyles points to the team and Massive Dynamic working more closely together to track down the other cortexiphan trial subjects--and the man seeking to activate them--and I'm hoping that we see a lot more of Blair Brown's Nina in the weeks to come.

All in all, another fantastic episode of Fringe that featured a compelling mystery of the week (though I wish one of the team members had mentioned the fact that the killer's attacks were suddenly increasing at an alarming rate) as well as an installment that placed the focus on the relationships between the core characters and their backstories. My only complaint: that more people aren't watching this remarkable series.

Next week on Fringe ("White Tulip"), when passengers aboard a commuter train appear to have died a still death, it seems that a switch was flipped because all cell phones, mp3 players, laptops, batteries and bodies have been drained of power; Peter remains suspicious that something is amiss with Walter; the investigation leads the Fringe Division to Alistair Peck, a very powerful man who wields tremendous energy with severe consequences.

Comments

mck said…
Completely agree about Kevin Corrigan's Sam Weiss. I for one would like to see Peter and Olivia get together, but for now I'm happy to see where this friendship goes.

Really wish I could get more people to watch this show, but at least we're a go for season three. The show still has some kinks to fix though. I don't always find the standalone episodes entertaining and wish they could all have some kernel of a connection to the show's mythology. I know that's a lot to ask of a show that's struggling to bring in new viewers.
OldDarth said…
Good review.

Put me down for Olivia and Peter being together romanatically though. Two lonely people that would be so good for each other.
Unknown said…
Olivia & Peter becoming romantically involved would be a "jumped the shark" move to me. Surely the "Fringe" writers can be more creative than employing that old and tired answer to the question, "Now what do we do?"

However, teasing us with it (i.e. the almost kiss), and then using that to explain Peter's understanding of Olivia's distance from him after she learns he's from the other universe? Brilliant!

Popular posts from this blog

Katie Lee Packs Her Knives: Breaking News from Bravo's "Top Chef"

The android has left the building. Or the test kitchen, anyway. Top Chef 's robotic host Katie Lee Joel, the veritable "Uptown Girl" herself (pictured at left), will NOT be sticking around for a second course of Bravo's hit culinary competition. According to a well-placed insider, Joel will "not be returning" to the show. No reason for her departure was cited. Unfortunately, the perfect replacement for Joel, Top Chef judge and professional chef Tom Colicchio, will not be taking over as the reality series' host (damn!). Instead, the show's producers are currently scouring to find a replacement for Joel. Top Chef 's second season was announced by Bravo last month, but no return date has been set for the series' ten-episode sophomore season. Stay tuned as this story develops. UPDATE (6/27): Bravo has now confirmed the above story .

Have a Burning Question for Team Darlton, Matthew Fox, Evangeline Lilly, or Michael Emerson?

Lost fans: you don't have to make your way to the island via Ajira Airways in order to ask a question of the creative team or the series' stars. Televisionary is taking questions from fans to put to Lost 's executive producers/showrunners Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse and stars Matthew Fox ("Jack Shephard"), Evangeline Lilly ("Kate Austen"), and Michael Emerson ("Benjamin Linus") for a series of on-camera interviews taking place this weekend. If you have a specific question for any of the above producers or actors from Lost , please leave it in the comments section below . I'll be accepting questions until midnight PT tonight and, while I can't promise I'll be able to ask any specific inquiry due to the brevity of these on-camera interviews, I am looking for some insightful and thought-provoking questions to add to the mix. So who knows: your burning question might get asked after all.

What's Done is Done: The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil on the Season Finale of "Lost"

Every story begins with thread. It's up to the storyteller to determine just how much they need to parcel out, what pattern they're making, and when to cut it short and tie it off. With last night's penultimate season finale of Lost ("The Incident, Parts One and Two"), written by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, we began to see the pattern that Lindelof and Cuse have been designing towards the last five seasons of this serpentine series. And it was only fitting that the two-hour finale, which pushes us on the road to the final season of Lost , should begin with thread, a loom, and a tapestry. Would Jack follow through on his plan to detonate the island and therefore reset their lives aboard Oceanic Flight 815 ? Why did Locke want to kill Jacob? What caused The Incident? What was in the box and just what lies in the shadow of the statue? We got the answers to these in a two-hour season finale that didn't quite pack the same emotional wallop of previous seas