Skip to main content

USA Sparks to "Thank You for Smoking"

Personally, I enjoyed Jason Reitman's satirical feature Thank You for Smoking and, well, would prefer to leave it at that.

Not so cabler USA, who has ordered a pilot script for a TV spinoff version of Smoking that would pickup where the feature--which starred Aaron Eckhart as an amoral lobbyist-- left off.

According to Variety, "Nick Naylor, having kicked some of his more evil lobbyist habits, will use his rhetorical skills to help people more deserving of aid."

Ick.

Or as Jeff Wachtel, USA's programming head, put it, "He'll live somewhere between the morally ambiguous character of the movie and Robin Hood."

Is it just me or should USA throw in a OCD-prone detective or a fake psychic into the mix there? What worked so well about the original was that moral vaccuum that Nick and his colleagues existed within; take that away and you have another smarmy series about a do-gooder attempting to find himself while helping others. Albeit with slightly more edginess than USA usually goes for.

TV version of Thank You for Smoking would likely get a name change. The pilot script will be written by James Dodson and executive produced by David Sacks, who produced the original feature film. Sacks also tried to set up a small-screen version of Smoking last season at NBC but the Peacock passed on the series.

* * *

In other series development news, FX and Fox TV Studios have signed a deal that will reunite the cabler (the home of The Riches and Damages) with Oscar winner Forest Whitaker (The Last King of Scotland), who memorably appeared in the home-grown series The Shield for both the network and studio.

Whitaker will direct and executive produce a drama series project, set in the high stakes world of arms dealers. Also on board the drama project are producers Cary Brokaw (HBO's Angels in America) and Eric Overmyer (Homicide: Life on the Street).

However, it's unclear whether the project, written by Jeremy Martin and Matthew Donlan (Joan of Arcadia), will star Whitaker or if his participation is limited solely to behind the camera.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Wow - that Thank You For Smoking series sounds just awful.
So bizzare. The series sounds like it will have none of the biting wit of the movie. And if they're changing the concept and title, why make it a spinoff at all? Shouldn't they have just come up with their own show about a smooth talking lawyer with Robin Hood-like qualities?
The CineManiac said…
In Fact the Thank You For Smoking series sounds like it doesn't have anything to do with the movie what-so-ever. It sounds like they are taking the characters name, and possibly the title and making something not worth our time.
I thought the days of turning movies into tv shows ended years ago, but between Sarah Conner and this, is it long before we get the likes of Ferris Bueller: The Series and Parker Lewis Can't Lose? (which was clearly based on the same movie)
Anonymous said…
Terrible terrible idea. The movie was great so why can't they just let things lie the way they are. New name, new characterizations, what's the point?

Popular posts from this blog

What's Done is Done: The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil on the Season Finale of "Lost"

Every story begins with thread. It's up to the storyteller to determine just how much they need to parcel out, what pattern they're making, and when to cut it short and tie it off. With last night's penultimate season finale of Lost ("The Incident, Parts One and Two"), written by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, we began to see the pattern that Lindelof and Cuse have been designing towards the last five seasons of this serpentine series. And it was only fitting that the two-hour finale, which pushes us on the road to the final season of Lost , should begin with thread, a loom, and a tapestry. Would Jack follow through on his plan to detonate the island and therefore reset their lives aboard Oceanic Flight 815 ? Why did Locke want to kill Jacob? What caused The Incident? What was in the box and just what lies in the shadow of the statue? We got the answers to these in a two-hour season finale that didn't quite pack the same emotional wallop of previous season

Pilot Inspektor: CBS' "Smith"

I may just have to change my original "What I'll Be Watching This Fall" post, as I sat down and finally watched CBS' new crime drama Smith this weekend. (What? It's taken me a long time to make my way through the stack of pilot DVDs.) While it's on following Gilmore Girls and Veronica Mars on Tuesday nights (10 pm ET/PT, to be exact), I'm going to be sure to leave enough room on my TiVo to make sure that I catch this compelling, amoral drama. While one can't help but be impressed by what might just be the most marquee-friendly cast in primetime--Ray Liotta, Virginia Madsen, Jonny Lee Miller, Amy Smart, Simon Baker, and Franky G all star and Shohreh Aghdashloo has a recurring role--the pilot's premise alone earned major points in my book: it's a crime drama from the point of view of the criminals, who engage in high-stakes heists. But don't be alarmed; it's nothing like NBC's short-lived Heist . Instead, think of it as The Italian

The Daily Beast: "How The Killing Went Wrong"

While the uproar over the U.S. version of The Killing has quieted, the show is still a pale imitation of the Danish series on which it is based. Over at The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "How The Killing Went Wrong," in which I look at how The Killing has handled itself during its second season, and compare it to the stunning and electrifying original Danish series, Forbrydelsen , on which it is based. (I recently watched all 20 episodes of Forbrydelsen over a few evenings.) The original is a mind-blowing and gut-wrenching work of genius. It’s not necessary to rehash the anger that followed in the wake of the conclusion last June of the first season of AMC’s mystery drama The Killing, based on Søren Sveistrup’s landmark Danish show Forbrydelsen, which follows the murder of a schoolgirl and its impact on the people whose lives the investigation touches upon. What followed were irate reviews, burnished with the “burning intensity of 10,000 white-hot suns