Skip to main content

Jobs, Schrute Bucks, and Confessions on the Season Finale of "The Office"

Was that not the best ending ever? I predicted last week that Jim and Pam would get together and it feels good to know that I'm still in tune with what The Office's writers are thinking. What a satisfying and creatively fulfilling way to end the season, not with the grand gesture of a stolen kiss (like in last year's finale) but with a seemingly simplistic request for a date. Ah, young love.

Last night's one-hour season finale of The Office ("The Job") proved that the show can work as a one-hour, a VERY good thing considering that earlier this week NBC ordered 30 episodes of the series for next season, including five one-hour installments. If they're as well coordinated and executed as "The Job," Season Four just might be a treasure rather than a botched experiment waiting to happen. Fingers crossed it's the former.

In any event, last night's installment crystallized exactly what makes us love The Office: those completely real, awkward, embarrassing moments we all feel. This week was no exception with one scene that perfectly captured the discomfort of modern office life: Jan being escorted from the building. Before getting into that, I just want to say what a remarkable job Melora Hardin did last night; her performance was riveting and she managed to showcase several different sides of Jan in a single episode: at times confident, vulnerable, dangerously aggressive, and delusional. And she clearly felt savvy enough to pull off the episode's , er, biggest sight gag: her boob job ("sorry, boob enhancement").

It's that scene, in full view of Jim and Karen, though, that took the cake as Jan is escorted into reception by two security guards as her stuff begins to fall out of her cardboard box; as she and Michael attempt to pick up items, more things crash to the floor and soon ex-assistant Hunter ("good luck with your band") is forced into helping... and then Jan walks out with a bleeped epithet for David Wallace. It's a particularly painful scene to watch as Jan loses all sense of dignity in leaving Dunder-Mifflin and, just when you think the gag has ended, it keeps going, a sort of live-action Simpsons joke that reminds us that Greg Daniels used to be a writer on The Simpsons.

Will Jan move in with Michael? It certainly seems that way, especially after her emotional breakdown in the car (thanks to her prescription painkillers), though I can't imagine Jan working full-time as Michael's stay-at-home, er, girlfriend. The scenario certainly yields a huge amount of comedic potential next season, however, and I can't wait to see where this storyline is going. (It's also clear now why they needed to break these two up so quickly a few episodes back.)

I think it's an interesting twist that the job interviews have been an effort to replace Jan at the corporate office (though I can't believe that Michael was the one to tell her that she's been axed) and that Jan will now have to adjust to life outside Dunder-Mifflin. I'm not quite sure I buy all the reasons for Jan's dismissal; sure, it's clear that the visiting her sister in Scottsdale line is code for her surgical enhancement and I loved that David Wallace called her out for constantly driving out to Scranton (a nice wink and nudge at the audience), but online shopping? I think that's stretching it a little bit and it doesn't really jive with the rest of Jan's character; she's always proven that she's an exceptional executive (even if a little out there since her divorce) and this diminishes her a little too much, in my opinion. But still, a minor gripe in an otherwise stellar episode.

I loved the tag with the reveal that David has actually hired Ryan to take over Jan's position (and that he spat out a "we're done" to Kelly before slyly grinning at the camera). It's a fantastic twist that no one saw coming; the easy answer would have been to have Karen land the job. But with Rashida Jones' pilot The Rules for Starting Over getting ordered to series for midseason on FOX, I have a feeling that we won't be seeing Karen around much next season (though hopefully a little bit). So did Jim just leave Karen in New York City having lunch with her friends downtown? I hope that our guy at least called her to say that he was driving back to Scranton and it was over between them rather than, you know, just leaving her stranded in Manhattan. Still, it was clear that Karen was much more at home in NYC than in Scranton, what with her knowledge of The Spotted Pig and "second-acting" Broadway plays, etc. She is a slick, corporate type who's too big for small town Scranton. I'm just hoping that we haven't seen the last of her.

I loved the New York scenes and I am so glad that the production decided to travel to Manhattan to shoot them on the city's streets (was that a shout-out to Sex and the City with a Carrie Bradshaw type hailing a cab?) rather than shoot them on a backlot. They gave the entire episode an urgency and reality that was completely visceral and made what happened next all the more powerful as Jim chooses Scranton (and Pam) over the overwhelming largeness of Manhattan (and Karen).

What else did I love? Dwight's fantasy about co-running a B&B with Satan in hell for a whopping 80 grand a year; Kelly calling Pam's speech "pathetic"; everyone's reactions to Jim's new haircut which made him look less "homeless"; Karen saying that Pam was kind of a bitch; Andy's surreal job interview with Dwight; Andy and Dwight painting Michael's office black; the wink Dwight gave his Secret Assistant to the Regional Manager; Creed's blog (www.creedthoughts.gov/www.creedthoughts); the debate about Schrute Bucks vs. Stanley Nickels; Pam slipping one of the Office Olympic gold medals into Jim's folder... and the list goes on and on for an episode as multi-layered and lovingly constructed as this one. (But I can't forget to mention Dwight's desire to hire Jack Bauer as his Number Two; it's probably the most interesting thing about 24 this year.)

Finally, there's Jim and Pam. I didn't think you needed that scene on the beach between the two of them (it both interrupted the flow of the episode and broke the series' narrative device--the documentary--even if it bookended the season with another, misused flashback) but that final scene between them summed up everything that's been unspoken this season.

I knew that by the season finale these two star-crossed lovers would find a way to be together and I'm glad that writers Paul Lieberstein and Michael Schur brought them together not with another kiss but with something different, something adult and mature that belies their newfound places in the world: a date. I loved how conflicted Pam was regarding the job situation in New York City; she believes in Jim but doesn't want to lose him and so puts her well-wishing behind eliminating her competition for his affections.

Jenna Fischer's expression during Pam's interrupted talking head (when Jim bursts in to ask her out) was priceless, a mix of awe, surprise, happiness, and relief. (Speaking of which, get well soon, Jenna! We're thinking of you!) In the last two weeks, both Jim and Pam have shown tremendous acts of bravery and it's been so emotionally rewarding to see them both stand up for what they believe in and be HONEST with one another for a change.

Will these two actually work out as a couple? Who can say? We'll find out for certain next season, but no matter what happens, I just know it will be as hilarious as it will be painful to watch. In a good way. But, in the end, isn't that what The Office does best?

What's On Tonight

8 pm: That's the Way It Is: Celebrating Cronkite at 90 (CBS); Dateline (NBC; 8-10 pm); WWE Friday Night SmackDown (CW; 8-10 pm); Grey's Anatomy (ABC); Nanny 911 (FOX)

9 pm: A Dr. Phil Primetime Special: Caged? (CBS); National Bingo Night (ABC); Bones (FOX)

10 pm: NUMB3RS (CBS); Law & Order (NBC); 20/20 (ABC)

What I'll Be Watching

8 pm: Absolutely Fabulous on BBC America.

What better way than to begin your weekend of debauchery than by starting it with two people even more pickled than you'll be? On tonight's "vintage" episode of AbFab ("Paris"), Pats and Edina head to Paris for a fashion shoot but it's Eddy and Saffy who end up bonding.

8:40 pm: Coupling on BBC America.

Revisit the Coupling gang way back when. On the first of two episodes tonight ("The Man With Two Legs"), Jeff falls in love with the leg of a woman on a train, while Sally introduces her new beau to the group. Then it's "My Dinner in Hell," in which Steve makes a fool of himself with his, er, solos when Susan's parents come round for dinner.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Jan's breakdown was actually one of my favorite parts of the episode. Melora Hardin did a fantastic job carrying out the physical and emotional comedy of the scene. It was painful and awkward and hilarious. Everything the show should be.

I'm also very happy with how they ended it. No sappy, overdramatic scene with Jim rushing into Pam's arms. Just a simple request for a date. Very nice. As was the reveal that Ryan is now heading to corporate. Great twist!
All Blog Spots said…
nice blog
Anonymous said…
I really think I need to watch this episode again. I was trying to put together my new fan, and someone should have been filming me doing this. And aired it on the Office. It took me nearly the entire episode to put together, and in reading your entry, I definitely missed some stuff by just listening. I watched the last 15 minutes, or so, though. Loved the Ryan twist. I blame Andy. He's the one who bought me the fan. Stupid andy.
Unknown said…
I rewound three times to re-watch Jenna Fischer's expression of startled pleasure--she's absolutely terrific as Pam. So real. So perfect. (Get well soon, Jenna!)

Although I like being surprised by Ryan getting Jan's job (and didn't we all know that's what they were interviewing for?), I don't like the implication that Jim broke up with Karen in NYC and--what?--expects her to come back to work in Scranton, in a humiliating environment where everyone knows Jim dumped her for Pam. No way. (BTW, how would calling her "to say that he was driving back to Scranton" not strand her??) Now, if it turns out that Karen's lunch with her friends convinced her she should move to NYC so they broke up, I'm okay with that. (But they have to have driven back together.)

That makes sense because a lot of foreshadowing set up Jim's "NYC vs Scranton": David's "What do you like about NYC?" and "Why do you like Scranton?," Karen's familiarity with NYC, Karen's "Michael would be a disaster," etc.

I loved Pam's "I hope you get the job" to Karen and Karen's "Thanks" followed by the dawning realization of what Pam's implying by that. Heh. Yeah, after that comment, Karen was right to say Pam's a bit of a bitch. Which, I think, is the result of her newfound courage. I'm okay with that, too.
Anonymous said…
Im a huge fan of the office and i would considered myself the same for The Simpsons, but i am not good at trivia and that stuff alike.

Im wondering what the reference to a Simpsons joke after Jan left the NYC office, where Michael "withdraws" from the job runnings.



Also, this was a good episode, like every office is, but it did lack slightly on the comedic side. I really dont like where they are going with all this.

Not having ryan in the office takes his sarcastic, self pitting, and otherwise bored view of the Scranton Branch, along with the loss of Michael and his relationship.

Jim and Pam can't get together, it just wont let the show work, unless the writers start to focus on being funny instead on Jim and Pam.I like laughing at the Office.

Where was Toby in all of this? ---Not sure if anyone noticed, but David Wallace's comment to Jim about the terrible HR person who works there Kimble(check on that name), probably the only person Jim wont like.

I too would like to wish Jenna Fisher a quick and happy recovery.

Just again, Simpson reference, i have to know on this.
Jace Lacob said…
M=2m, it's not a reference to a particular Simpsons joke, but the stylistic device Simpsons jokes often have (like the Sideshow Bob-stepping-on-rakes joke from way back when, for example); once they've stretched the joke as far as it can possibly go, it improbably continues even further. Just as in the painfulness of Jan's departure scene, where the joke wasn't that she dropped an item but that she kept, repeatedly, dropping things.

Popular posts from this blog

Katie Lee Packs Her Knives: Breaking News from Bravo's "Top Chef"

The android has left the building. Or the test kitchen, anyway. Top Chef 's robotic host Katie Lee Joel, the veritable "Uptown Girl" herself (pictured at left), will NOT be sticking around for a second course of Bravo's hit culinary competition. According to a well-placed insider, Joel will "not be returning" to the show. No reason for her departure was cited. Unfortunately, the perfect replacement for Joel, Top Chef judge and professional chef Tom Colicchio, will not be taking over as the reality series' host (damn!). Instead, the show's producers are currently scouring to find a replacement for Joel. Top Chef 's second season was announced by Bravo last month, but no return date has been set for the series' ten-episode sophomore season. Stay tuned as this story develops. UPDATE (6/27): Bravo has now confirmed the above story .

Have a Burning Question for Team Darlton, Matthew Fox, Evangeline Lilly, or Michael Emerson?

Lost fans: you don't have to make your way to the island via Ajira Airways in order to ask a question of the creative team or the series' stars. Televisionary is taking questions from fans to put to Lost 's executive producers/showrunners Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse and stars Matthew Fox ("Jack Shephard"), Evangeline Lilly ("Kate Austen"), and Michael Emerson ("Benjamin Linus") for a series of on-camera interviews taking place this weekend. If you have a specific question for any of the above producers or actors from Lost , please leave it in the comments section below . I'll be accepting questions until midnight PT tonight and, while I can't promise I'll be able to ask any specific inquiry due to the brevity of these on-camera interviews, I am looking for some insightful and thought-provoking questions to add to the mix. So who knows: your burning question might get asked after all.

What's Done is Done: The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil on the Season Finale of "Lost"

Every story begins with thread. It's up to the storyteller to determine just how much they need to parcel out, what pattern they're making, and when to cut it short and tie it off. With last night's penultimate season finale of Lost ("The Incident, Parts One and Two"), written by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, we began to see the pattern that Lindelof and Cuse have been designing towards the last five seasons of this serpentine series. And it was only fitting that the two-hour finale, which pushes us on the road to the final season of Lost , should begin with thread, a loom, and a tapestry. Would Jack follow through on his plan to detonate the island and therefore reset their lives aboard Oceanic Flight 815 ? Why did Locke want to kill Jacob? What caused The Incident? What was in the box and just what lies in the shadow of the statue? We got the answers to these in a two-hour season finale that didn't quite pack the same emotional wallop of previous seas