Skip to main content

"FlashForward" Returns: Who's In?

I'll admit, this was meant to be an advance review of tonight's two-hour spring premiere of ABC's FlashForward, but I couldn't get ABC's Medianet video player to stop skipping and eventually gave up altogether.

That's perhaps symbolic of my frustration in general with ABC's creatively uneven sci-fi series, which returns tonight after a lengthy hiatus with the promise of answers, answers, and more answers.

While I applaud the producers for seeing the value in providing solutions to the many mysteries that the early episodes produced, my main issue with the series is that I just don't care at all for these characters, their situations, or what they saw in their flash-forwards. Which is a major problem for a series that spends a great deal of its time having the character talk endlessly about fate, free will, and conscious choice.

All of which makes me wonder if I'll bother tuning in to the twelve remaining episodes this season. FlashForward has already fallen off my must-see priority list for Thursday nights, which meant that I was getting around to these episodes whenever I had free time.

But I am wondering: with FlashForward set to return tonight, which among you is looking forward to its return and which of you has already given up on the series? Are you willing to give it another chance? Or did you know you'd stop watching based on your own flash-forward last fall? Discuss, along with reasons why.

FlashForward returns tonight with a two-hour episode from 8-10 pm ET/PT on ABC.

Comments

SamSee said…
This show was the biggest disappointment of the season. I was really excited about it and even liked the first episode but it was all downhill from there. I agree with your criticism of the show and most definitely will not be tuning in.
Unknown said…
We're going to watch it. I do like how they've veered away from the book. I'm leery but hopeful because it seems to have so much potential.
gina said…
I won't be returning to the show, and for the same reasons as you: I just don't care. At all. And that makes me sad, because I was so excited for this show.

Oh, and I have a HUGE problem with Joseph Fiennes. Very poor casting choice, imo.
The CineManiac said…
I'm not terribly excited abut tonight's return, and I likely won't be watching it until this weekend, if then.
But I'll at least DVR it and see if it's any better. If not, I will probably spend that time rewatching Chuck on DVD.
Anonymous said…
Good, I hope you don't watch. This show is one of the few reasons I turn on the tv. I'm just as excited about the show as I ever was. Can't wait
Dr. Spaceman said…
I share your frustration. I first read the script to the pilot more than a year ago and was instantly captivated--it was a great setup, lots of suspense and mystery, and great characters.

Unfortunately little of that made it to the screen, and the show's two largest problems have been its poor writing (which is uneven and often lacks grounding in the "real world") and the actors (many of whom are hopelessly miscast). It's a shame because the show had so much potential. After it was picked up, everyone worried what the second SEASON would be like, but no one thought they'd have problems as early as the second EPISODE.

That said, I'll probably check it out again... to see if it's gotten any better and if it can possibly live up to its potential.
Anonymous said…
I actually love this show and I'm excited it's returning. Unlike you, I do find the characters intriguing and I'm curious about what's going to happen.
crabbyanne said…
I actually love this show and I'm excited it's returning. Unlike you, I do find the characters intriguing and I'm curious about what's going to happen.
Kevin Sole said…
I tuned out around episode 6, so I definitely will not be returning. Instead, I'll loan out the book from the library, and read something well written.
Anonymous said…
I tried to be excited about the return of this series since this is the type of TV I like. However, I find also that I just don't care. I fell asleep trying to watch the 2-hour premiere. I'm going to try again. There's just something about this show that doesn't captivate me. Maybe it's the quality of writing and the casting. One thing you mentioned -- Fate, Free Will and Conscious Choice -- these are some of the themes in LOST and that show is fantastic! Which makes me conclude that the writing and casting could be stronger. Such a shame. This was the perfect time for this show to make a splash on ABC especially given the exit of LOST. The hiatus doesn't help either.
Tyra said…
It has to be the casting and quality of writing. The show has great moments. but I find myself struggling to watch this show. And the hiatus doesn't help at all either, especially now that LOST is back and once Fringe returns you can just forget about this show being at the top of my "must watch" TV list.

Popular posts from this blog

What's Done is Done: The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil on the Season Finale of "Lost"

Every story begins with thread. It's up to the storyteller to determine just how much they need to parcel out, what pattern they're making, and when to cut it short and tie it off. With last night's penultimate season finale of Lost ("The Incident, Parts One and Two"), written by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, we began to see the pattern that Lindelof and Cuse have been designing towards the last five seasons of this serpentine series. And it was only fitting that the two-hour finale, which pushes us on the road to the final season of Lost , should begin with thread, a loom, and a tapestry. Would Jack follow through on his plan to detonate the island and therefore reset their lives aboard Oceanic Flight 815 ? Why did Locke want to kill Jacob? What caused The Incident? What was in the box and just what lies in the shadow of the statue? We got the answers to these in a two-hour season finale that didn't quite pack the same emotional wallop of previous season

Pilot Inspektor: CBS' "Smith"

I may just have to change my original "What I'll Be Watching This Fall" post, as I sat down and finally watched CBS' new crime drama Smith this weekend. (What? It's taken me a long time to make my way through the stack of pilot DVDs.) While it's on following Gilmore Girls and Veronica Mars on Tuesday nights (10 pm ET/PT, to be exact), I'm going to be sure to leave enough room on my TiVo to make sure that I catch this compelling, amoral drama. While one can't help but be impressed by what might just be the most marquee-friendly cast in primetime--Ray Liotta, Virginia Madsen, Jonny Lee Miller, Amy Smart, Simon Baker, and Franky G all star and Shohreh Aghdashloo has a recurring role--the pilot's premise alone earned major points in my book: it's a crime drama from the point of view of the criminals, who engage in high-stakes heists. But don't be alarmed; it's nothing like NBC's short-lived Heist . Instead, think of it as The Italian

The Daily Beast: "How The Killing Went Wrong"

While the uproar over the U.S. version of The Killing has quieted, the show is still a pale imitation of the Danish series on which it is based. Over at The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "How The Killing Went Wrong," in which I look at how The Killing has handled itself during its second season, and compare it to the stunning and electrifying original Danish series, Forbrydelsen , on which it is based. (I recently watched all 20 episodes of Forbrydelsen over a few evenings.) The original is a mind-blowing and gut-wrenching work of genius. It’s not necessary to rehash the anger that followed in the wake of the conclusion last June of the first season of AMC’s mystery drama The Killing, based on Søren Sveistrup’s landmark Danish show Forbrydelsen, which follows the murder of a schoolgirl and its impact on the people whose lives the investigation touches upon. What followed were irate reviews, burnished with the “burning intensity of 10,000 white-hot suns