Skip to main content

Searching for a New Tennant: More Casting Rumors Swirl Around "Doctor Who"

It's time again, ladies and gentlemen, for another update on the Doctor Who casting situation, namely who will be named David Tennant's successor as the Eleventh Doctor on the BBC drama. (Meanwhile, voting for the next Doctor continues apace at Televisionary, in my post about my top suggestions for possible replacements for Tennant.)

British tabloid The Mirror claims that the frontrunner to replace Tennant as the Doctor is 29-year-old former EastEnders star Tom Ellis. Ellis played Thomas Milligan in Season Three of Doctor Who but I can't help but think that The Mirror is off-base on this one.

While other guest stars have gone on to play other characters in the Who-universe (Freema Agyeman and Eve Myles, I am looking at you), this seems a rather odd choice to me, given the fact that Ellis is far less known than some of the other candidates and already played a crucial role in the Season Three finale endgame. (Besides, if anyone were to turn up again, I'd rather it be John Simm.)

The Mirror also says that Robert Carlyle (24: Redemption), Paterson Joseph (Jekyll), and David Morrissey (who appears in this year's Christmas special) are in the mix as well. (Before anyone reacts, remember: this is The Mirror, after all and not exactly a bastion of journalistic integrity.) One oddsmaker has Morrissey as the most likely contender.

As for James Nesbitt, whom many believed would take over as the Doctor, he says that he has no interest in the role, liking it to "career suicide."

Meanwhile, David Tennant hasn't completely ruled out a possible return to Doctor Who somewhere down the road, despite announcing his intent to leave the series at the end of 2009. "Who knows what might happen in the future?" said Tennant in an interview with BBC Breakfast. "The door isn't necessarily closed forever."

Tennant, however, has no idea about who would be his replacement and said that it could be anyone. "I actually think it's one of those parts that any actor could bring something very valid to, because he can be anything and because it's a sort of blank canvas every time," said Tennant. "In fact, the difference is the virtue with each doctor, it's not like recasting Tarzan, where you have to got someone who looks good in a loin cloth. It can sort of be anything."

(Hell, he even went so far as to suggest former series star Billie Piper could play the role.)

Take a look at Tennant's appearance on BBC Breakfast below:



Stay tuned.

Comments

Anonymous said…
So many excellent actors...and yet, I still can't imagine any of them topping Tennant's performance!
R.A. Porter said…
How about Phil Glenister, assuming he's freed up soon. That would be a much more action-oriented Doctor, sort of like Peter Davison was more physical in the role than Tom Baker.

Besides, who wouldn't like to see a Doctor who occasionally liked fisticuffs?

Popular posts from this blog

What's Done is Done: The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil on the Season Finale of "Lost"

Every story begins with thread. It's up to the storyteller to determine just how much they need to parcel out, what pattern they're making, and when to cut it short and tie it off. With last night's penultimate season finale of Lost ("The Incident, Parts One and Two"), written by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, we began to see the pattern that Lindelof and Cuse have been designing towards the last five seasons of this serpentine series. And it was only fitting that the two-hour finale, which pushes us on the road to the final season of Lost , should begin with thread, a loom, and a tapestry. Would Jack follow through on his plan to detonate the island and therefore reset their lives aboard Oceanic Flight 815 ? Why did Locke want to kill Jacob? What caused The Incident? What was in the box and just what lies in the shadow of the statue? We got the answers to these in a two-hour season finale that didn't quite pack the same emotional wallop of previous season

Pilot Inspektor: CBS' "Smith"

I may just have to change my original "What I'll Be Watching This Fall" post, as I sat down and finally watched CBS' new crime drama Smith this weekend. (What? It's taken me a long time to make my way through the stack of pilot DVDs.) While it's on following Gilmore Girls and Veronica Mars on Tuesday nights (10 pm ET/PT, to be exact), I'm going to be sure to leave enough room on my TiVo to make sure that I catch this compelling, amoral drama. While one can't help but be impressed by what might just be the most marquee-friendly cast in primetime--Ray Liotta, Virginia Madsen, Jonny Lee Miller, Amy Smart, Simon Baker, and Franky G all star and Shohreh Aghdashloo has a recurring role--the pilot's premise alone earned major points in my book: it's a crime drama from the point of view of the criminals, who engage in high-stakes heists. But don't be alarmed; it's nothing like NBC's short-lived Heist . Instead, think of it as The Italian

The Daily Beast: "How The Killing Went Wrong"

While the uproar over the U.S. version of The Killing has quieted, the show is still a pale imitation of the Danish series on which it is based. Over at The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "How The Killing Went Wrong," in which I look at how The Killing has handled itself during its second season, and compare it to the stunning and electrifying original Danish series, Forbrydelsen , on which it is based. (I recently watched all 20 episodes of Forbrydelsen over a few evenings.) The original is a mind-blowing and gut-wrenching work of genius. It’s not necessary to rehash the anger that followed in the wake of the conclusion last June of the first season of AMC’s mystery drama The Killing, based on Søren Sveistrup’s landmark Danish show Forbrydelsen, which follows the murder of a schoolgirl and its impact on the people whose lives the investigation touches upon. What followed were irate reviews, burnished with the “burning intensity of 10,000 white-hot suns