Skip to main content

The Curious Case of Benjamin Linus: Getting "Lost" with Michael Emerson

I'll be blunt: Benjamin Linus scares the living bejesus out of me.

So I was a little terrified (to put it mildly) to be in the same room with Michael Emerson, who plays the villainous (or is he?) Ben on ABC's Lost.

But I am glad I put my irrational fear of Ben out of my mind as the soft-spoken Emerson was the very opposite of the character he plays on Lost: articulate, charming, and disarming... which just might be what makes Ben so dangerous.

I sat down with Emerson to talk about what we could expect for Lost's fourth season (kicking off on ABC this Thursday) and the ruthless leader of the Others.

Q: In the last part of Season Three, we learned a great deal about Ben’s backstory. Do you view him as a hero or a villain? And going into Season Four, does your perception of him change?

Emerson: Well, I’ve always had a notion that there was something heroic about him, that there was more to him than met the eye. That notion has been challenged somewhat by the sort of wickedness that seemed to be his, late in Season Three. But I’m going to hold on to the idea that we will revisit some of those events and they will be put in a new context. I think it’s still possible that Ben’s secret agenda is a heroic one.

Q: Throughout your career, you’ve been attracted to very complex characters. What about Ben attracts you as a performer and what about him do you find so incredibly engaging?

Emerson: I don’t know if I’m attracted to complex characters or really simple characters. Maybe it’s a little of both. But I do like that Ben is ambiguous. I’ve always liked that. I think because it tells the truth about people in general and about wicked people in particular that we don’t wear much of who we are on the surface. So, I enjoy playing him in a sort of a neutral gear and I think it leaves more to the audience’s imagination, which is what everyone in show business should be in the business of.

Q: At the end of Season Three, we saw Ben striving to prevent the castaways from activating that satellite phone and he was, at the very end, bloody and beaten. What kind of circumstances, both emotional and physical, do we find Ben in at the beginning of Season Four?

Emerson: We pick right up where we left off. The early part of Season Four is, if anything, more blood, more beatings, more violence. It’s… a period of upheaval in the lives of the Lost-aways and their adversaries and, of course, there are new adversaries as well.

Q: Were you surprised about the twist ending at the end of Season Three?

Emerson: I thought it was a stroke of genius. To project the show into a third sort of dimension of time, this is the thing that will make Season Four so great. It's some highly subtle video game we’ve now broken in to the tier of expertise so, a show that was previously two armies of adversaries working in two dimensions of time, now it’s going to be three armies and three dimensions of time. But it just gets more complex and, I think, more grown up.

Q: While I know you can’t go into specifics about Season Four, in terms of the dynamic between your character and Elizabeth Mitchell’s Juliet, do we see another shift in that sort of adversarial, sometimes on the same side dynamic?

Emerson: Yes, that relationship gets explored regularly on the show, generally in flashback, as far as I know. But... there are present day confrontations about to erupt.

Q: What do you hope to see for Ben in Season Four?

Emerson: What do I want to see for Ben in the fourth season? I hope that Ben is able to remain as compelling and mysterious as he has been. I think we’ll see Ben face greater challenges with fewer resources and that he might be propelled into a sort of a more heroic aura.

Hmmm, a heroic aura for a character who has proven himself a Machiavellian manipulator of the highest order? Stranger things have happened on Lost and I for one can't wait to see what happens to Ben next.

Part 2: Elizabeth Mitchell.
Part 3: Yunjin Kim

Season Four of Lost launches Thursday, January 31st at 9 pm ET/PT on ABC.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Great interview, Jace. I can't wait for Thursday night!
The CineManiac said…
Can't wait to watch the premiere this week, and as I've said I'm super jealous of you for this interview.
Anonymous said…
Thanks for the fantastic interview! I needed a Lost fix and this was perfect. Michael Emerson is such an incredible actor and, obviously, a very intelligent person too. I can't imagine Lost without him!
Anonymous said…
Awesome interview! I can't wait for next season and for your piece with Elizabeth Mitchell. Lucky dog!
Anonymous said…
Awesome. Just awesome.
Anonymous said…
Big Spoiler: Ben is actually Thom York from Radiohead!!! That's why he has access to 3.2 mil!!

Popular posts from this blog

What's Done is Done: The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil on the Season Finale of "Lost"

Every story begins with thread. It's up to the storyteller to determine just how much they need to parcel out, what pattern they're making, and when to cut it short and tie it off. With last night's penultimate season finale of Lost ("The Incident, Parts One and Two"), written by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, we began to see the pattern that Lindelof and Cuse have been designing towards the last five seasons of this serpentine series. And it was only fitting that the two-hour finale, which pushes us on the road to the final season of Lost , should begin with thread, a loom, and a tapestry. Would Jack follow through on his plan to detonate the island and therefore reset their lives aboard Oceanic Flight 815 ? Why did Locke want to kill Jacob? What caused The Incident? What was in the box and just what lies in the shadow of the statue? We got the answers to these in a two-hour season finale that didn't quite pack the same emotional wallop of previous season

Pilot Inspektor: CBS' "Smith"

I may just have to change my original "What I'll Be Watching This Fall" post, as I sat down and finally watched CBS' new crime drama Smith this weekend. (What? It's taken me a long time to make my way through the stack of pilot DVDs.) While it's on following Gilmore Girls and Veronica Mars on Tuesday nights (10 pm ET/PT, to be exact), I'm going to be sure to leave enough room on my TiVo to make sure that I catch this compelling, amoral drama. While one can't help but be impressed by what might just be the most marquee-friendly cast in primetime--Ray Liotta, Virginia Madsen, Jonny Lee Miller, Amy Smart, Simon Baker, and Franky G all star and Shohreh Aghdashloo has a recurring role--the pilot's premise alone earned major points in my book: it's a crime drama from the point of view of the criminals, who engage in high-stakes heists. But don't be alarmed; it's nothing like NBC's short-lived Heist . Instead, think of it as The Italian

The Daily Beast: "How The Killing Went Wrong"

While the uproar over the U.S. version of The Killing has quieted, the show is still a pale imitation of the Danish series on which it is based. Over at The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "How The Killing Went Wrong," in which I look at how The Killing has handled itself during its second season, and compare it to the stunning and electrifying original Danish series, Forbrydelsen , on which it is based. (I recently watched all 20 episodes of Forbrydelsen over a few evenings.) The original is a mind-blowing and gut-wrenching work of genius. It’s not necessary to rehash the anger that followed in the wake of the conclusion last June of the first season of AMC’s mystery drama The Killing, based on Søren Sveistrup’s landmark Danish show Forbrydelsen, which follows the murder of a schoolgirl and its impact on the people whose lives the investigation touches upon. What followed were irate reviews, burnished with the “burning intensity of 10,000 white-hot suns