Skip to main content

"Veronica" Only a "Probable Contender" at the CW... and Other Gems from the Upstart Network

While all of the networks scurry to put the final touches on their fall lineups before the upfronts later this month, many in Hollywood continue to guess (and second guess) the fall schedule of one network in particular: the CW.

While many have dismissed the idea of combining struggling netlets UPN and the WB into a single network entity, others--myself included--can't help but watch with a sick fascination, trying to make heads or tails of which shows will be saved and which shows will end up on the scrap heap. CW President Dawn Ostroff certainly has her work cut out for her, but she also has the plum position of being able to pick and choose programs from among two (defunct) network schedules... and maybe order one or two pilots to series as well.

The New York Times today offered a behind-the-scenes feature on the goings-on at the CW and spoke with CBS head Les Moonves as well as CW czar Dawn Ostroff about which shows might make it onto their new network's fall lineup.

CW is not making anything official yet, but among the shows that Mr. Moonves and Ms. Ostroff said would almost surely be included on the new schedule are America's Next Top Model and Everybody Hates Chris from UPN and Gilmore Girls and Smallville from WB.

Other probable contenders include Veronica Mars, and several of the shows from the Monday night UPN comedy lineup of One on One, All of Us, Girlfriends, and Half and Half as well as Supernatural and Beauty and the Geek from WB.
How can Veronica Mars still only be categorized as a "probable contender" to be listed in the same sentence as One on One and All of Us? How can Ostroff and Moonves fail to see the brilliance of the writing, the understated grace of the cast, and just the sheer genius of creator Rob Thomas? Then again, here's a perfect example of CW's thought processes:

So what about the name? At the meeting in March, the marketing department offered a list of about 15 potential names.

The selections were aimed at being as hip as possible: the Evo network; the Now network. There was a proposal to call it NXTV (as in "Next TV") or XYTV (for the audience generations being spoken to), or something even more avant-garde: the Angle network.

You. Have. Got. To. Be. Joking.

I've waited months to learn what the execs were thinking when they came up with the truly lousy CW, a truly inspired combination of CBS and WB. But I shudder to think of the cast-off names that were tossed out with yesterday's Barney Greengrass salads. The Evo network? The Now network? NXTV? The Angle? Here I thought that the CW was a lame moniker but I guess, compared to the alternatives, it's really not all that bad. It could be worse...

Mr. Moonves emphasized that as a new network, CW wants to add at least a few new shows, if only to signal that it has something of its own to offer.

"At CBS scheduling meetings, I always say: Don't fall in love with the new girl, don't get carried away," Mr. Moonves said. "With the CW, I might say: It's O.K. to fall in love with the new girl, instead of the old wife."

Um, sure. I think that makes my case better than anything I could have said. Maybe the New Girl Network would have been a more suitable name then.


Anonymous said…
Well, call me a cock-eyed optimist, but I am happy to see it listed in the second paragraph and as a "probable" since some other shows that have been thought of as probable don't even get a mention. But still, I'd be much happier if it was in that first grouping.

(and in a note of irony, when I went to type in my word verificaiton code, the first two letter
Anonymous said…
Very happy to see that "Everybody Hates Chris" has an "almost certain" spot on the new CW. But "Veronica" should definitely be on the top tier too. Maybe they could do a cross over where, using a time machine created by Mac, Veronica travels back to the eighties to help Chris get rid of his bully. Wouldn't you just love to see Veronica sporting leg warmers and a stonewashed jean jacket. Anyone?
Anonymous said…
Can the Board put Les Moonves in his place already? I mean seriously....because of him we're tortured with still having Julie Chen on the air. As if any other network would've kept her on the air this long.
Daniel said…
Sure, we all want "Veronica Mars" to make the move to the CW, but if you're launching a new network, can you really afford to guarantee a position to a drama that has struggled to average more than 2.3 million viewers per week and that hasn't show even moderate audience growth despite two full seasons of rave reviews and online panting?

Yes, having a show with that kind of critical credibility would been a boon for The CW and it would instantly engender good faith with a certain subset of viewers. But even with a lead-in of fresh episodes of "America's Next Top Model," the best and most-watched show UPN has to offer, "Veronica Mars" has never found any kind of audience and you can't provide any statistical evidence that it's gaining traction or would be likely to gain traction on the new network.

If The CW picks the show up, they're making a clear qualitative statement, but they're also guaranteeing at least one dead programming hour per week, ratings-wise.

Do I hope they choose to bring it back? Heck yeah. Would I understand the decision-making process if they don't? Probably...

Popular posts from this blog

Katie Lee Packs Her Knives: Breaking News from Bravo's "Top Chef"

The android has left the building. Or the test kitchen, anyway. Top Chef 's robotic host Katie Lee Joel, the veritable "Uptown Girl" herself (pictured at left), will NOT be sticking around for a second course of Bravo's hit culinary competition. According to a well-placed insider, Joel will "not be returning" to the show. No reason for her departure was cited. Unfortunately, the perfect replacement for Joel, Top Chef judge and professional chef Tom Colicchio, will not be taking over as the reality series' host (damn!). Instead, the show's producers are currently scouring to find a replacement for Joel. Top Chef 's second season was announced by Bravo last month, but no return date has been set for the series' ten-episode sophomore season. Stay tuned as this story develops. UPDATE (6/27): Bravo has now confirmed the above story .

BBC Culture: Matthew Weiner: Mad Men’s creator on its final episodes

The creative force behind the period drama talks about where his characters are as his show begins its final episodes. “We left off with everyone’s material needs being met in an extreme way,” says Mad Men creator Matthew Weiner of where we last saw the characters on his critically acclaimed period drama when the show went on hiatus 10 months ago. “Then the issue is, what else is there?” That is the central question with the return to US TV of the AMC hit, one demanding to be answered by both the show’s characters, and its creator whose success is the envy of the television industry. Mad Men has been a defining part of Weiner’s life for the last 15 years. He wrote the pilot script on spec while he was a staff writer on CBS’ Ted Danson sitcom Becker in 1999, using it to land a writing gig on HBO’s The Sopranos in 2002. It would take another five years, filled with multiple rejections, before the first episode of Mad Men would make it on the air. Someone with less determination or vision

BuzzFeed: Meet The TV Successor To "Serial"

HBO's stranger-than-fiction true crime documentary The Jinx   — about real estate heir Robert Durst — brings the chills and thrills missing since Serial   wrapped up its first season. Serial   obsessives: HBO's latest documentary series is exactly what you've been waiting for.   The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst , like Sarah Koenig's beloved podcast, sifts through old documents, finds new leads from fresh interviews, and seeks to determine just what happened on a fateful day in which the most foul murder was committed. And, also like  Serial  before it,  The Jinx may also hold no ultimate answer to innocence or guilt. But that seems almost beside the point; such investigations often remain murky and unclear, and guilt is not so easy a thing to be judged. Instead, this upcoming six-part tantalizing murder mystery, from director Andrew Jarecki ( Capturing the Friedmans ), is a gripping true crime story that unfolds with all of the speed of a page-turner; it