Skip to main content

Wild Card: Cannibalism, Gas Crises, and Manhunters on "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia"

I don't know about you, but I haven't laughed as hard as I did last night a long time.

I'm talking of course about the fourth season premiere of FX's deliriously zany comedy series It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, which aired two gleefully inappropriate back-to-back episodes last night ("Mac & Dennis: Manhunters" and "The Gang Solves the Gas Crisis"), the latter of which was written by new writing staff additions Sonny Lee and Patrick Walsh, who also write the series' equally hilarious Paddy's Pub blog. (If you haven't yet checked out Paddy's Pub, please do ASAP. It currently features excerpts from Dennis' erotic memoirs, behind-the-scenes videos, and Ask Dirty Frank.)

Last night's painfully funny installments didn't feature the gang learning any valuable life lessons, maturing in any fashion, or throwing off their outmoded ideas about energy consumption, cannibalism, or, well, hunting a man on the streets of Philadelphia. What these hilarious episodes did feature, however, was an over-the-top absurdist humor that I find hysterical and a band of selfish, ill-informed louts whose interactions I can't get enough of.

Sure, Charlie and Sweet Dee became convinced they were cannibals afte consuming some of Frank's human meat (it ended up being raccoon meat and their cannibalistic hunger was likely just a tapeworm) and Dennis and Mac hunted poor Cricket like the most dangerous game and the second episode featured Charlie siphoning gas with his mouth and blowing fireballs, car crashes, and Sweet Dee and Frank staking out an apartment in a "rape van," but it's that level of sheer wackiness that I find myself addicted to. Much like Charlie and Sweet Dee's ravenous hunger, if I'm being honest.

Like Seinfeld before it, Sunny wipes the slate clean at the end of each episode, restoring a temporary order to the chaos of the lives of Paddy's Pub's owners Dennis, Dee, Mac, Charlie, and Frank. I don't expect these characters to ever grow or mature as human beings... and I'd be turned off completely if they did. What makes the series so memorable and laugh-out-loud funny is these characters' infantile behavior. To say that they are stuck in a perpetual state of arrested development is to let them off the hook easily; it's safe to say that none of them have any more emotional maturity than you'd find in your average vicious high schooler.

What other series would feature one of its lead characters cutting the brakes of their van and then jumping out of the back, yelling "wild card"? (Okay, maybe Inside the Actors Studio, but that James Lipton is a wiry fellow.) Or having two characters debate white and dark meat while standing in a morgue contemplating which cadaver they'd most like to feed on?

And that, to me, is what makes Sunny so fantastic to watch. There is no telling just what these egocentric low-lives will get up to next and, no matter what depths the writers choose to sink to, I know I will be along for the ride, interior tinted windows and all.

I wouldn't have it any other way.

Next week on It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, it's two back-to-back episodes. Up first is "America's Next Top Paddy's Billboard Model Contest," in which Frank and Mac invest in a billboard and then create a competition to find Paddy's next top model while Dee and Charlie try to create a new YouTube sensation. Then it's "Mac's Banging the Waitress" in which Charlie asks Mac to beat up the new boyfriend of his beloved waitress and Dennis tries to convince Charlie that they are best friends.

Comments

I am so mad--I actually fell asleep during the second episode! (I know this seems impossible but I was very, very tired.) The first ep was fantastic, though. Only this show could get away with a storyline about cannibalism and have it be hilarious. And I can't wait to get home tonight to watch the second ep. It will be the perfect end to a long week.

Popular posts from this blog

What's Done is Done: The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil on the Season Finale of "Lost"

Every story begins with thread. It's up to the storyteller to determine just how much they need to parcel out, what pattern they're making, and when to cut it short and tie it off. With last night's penultimate season finale of Lost ("The Incident, Parts One and Two"), written by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, we began to see the pattern that Lindelof and Cuse have been designing towards the last five seasons of this serpentine series. And it was only fitting that the two-hour finale, which pushes us on the road to the final season of Lost , should begin with thread, a loom, and a tapestry. Would Jack follow through on his plan to detonate the island and therefore reset their lives aboard Oceanic Flight 815 ? Why did Locke want to kill Jacob? What caused The Incident? What was in the box and just what lies in the shadow of the statue? We got the answers to these in a two-hour season finale that didn't quite pack the same emotional wallop of previous season

Pilot Inspektor: CBS' "Smith"

I may just have to change my original "What I'll Be Watching This Fall" post, as I sat down and finally watched CBS' new crime drama Smith this weekend. (What? It's taken me a long time to make my way through the stack of pilot DVDs.) While it's on following Gilmore Girls and Veronica Mars on Tuesday nights (10 pm ET/PT, to be exact), I'm going to be sure to leave enough room on my TiVo to make sure that I catch this compelling, amoral drama. While one can't help but be impressed by what might just be the most marquee-friendly cast in primetime--Ray Liotta, Virginia Madsen, Jonny Lee Miller, Amy Smart, Simon Baker, and Franky G all star and Shohreh Aghdashloo has a recurring role--the pilot's premise alone earned major points in my book: it's a crime drama from the point of view of the criminals, who engage in high-stakes heists. But don't be alarmed; it's nothing like NBC's short-lived Heist . Instead, think of it as The Italian

The Daily Beast: "How The Killing Went Wrong"

While the uproar over the U.S. version of The Killing has quieted, the show is still a pale imitation of the Danish series on which it is based. Over at The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "How The Killing Went Wrong," in which I look at how The Killing has handled itself during its second season, and compare it to the stunning and electrifying original Danish series, Forbrydelsen , on which it is based. (I recently watched all 20 episodes of Forbrydelsen over a few evenings.) The original is a mind-blowing and gut-wrenching work of genius. It’s not necessary to rehash the anger that followed in the wake of the conclusion last June of the first season of AMC’s mystery drama The Killing, based on Søren Sveistrup’s landmark Danish show Forbrydelsen, which follows the murder of a schoolgirl and its impact on the people whose lives the investigation touches upon. What followed were irate reviews, burnished with the “burning intensity of 10,000 white-hot suns