Skip to main content

Playing Cupid: An Advance Review of "Emma" on PBS' "Masterpiece Classic"

"Better to be without sense than misapply it as you do." - Mr. Knightley

Jane Austen's novel "Emma" remains an enduring masterpiece of biting wit, scathing satire, and Regency society-trapped-in-amber since its publication in 1815. Even nearly 200 years later, there's still quite a bit of relevance and humor to be found in its pages and the novel's matchmaking heroine Emma Woodhouse--young, spoiled, and naive--remains a favorite for readers of all ages.

Douglas McGrath's 1996 Emma, which starred Gwyneth Paltrow, Toni Collette, Alan Cumming, and Ewan McGregor, remains a favorite of mine when thinking of Austen adaptations. Daringly breaking away from the stylistic constraints of 19th century English novels, McGrath infused this story with modern flourishes, creating something timeless in and of itself. Likewise, the 1995 feature film Clueless transplanted Emma Woodhouse to mid-90s Beverly Hills, transforming the Austen heroine into the vapid Cher Horowitz (Alicia Silverstone), a matchmaking naif addicted to her cell phone, the mall, and the cheeky banter she shared with her own Mr. Knightley, Josh (Paul Rudd).

While it's difficult to place those utterly fantastic adaptations out of your head when considering "Emma," there's something to be said also for authenticity and straightforwardness. Which brings us to the most recent "Emma" adaptation, Masterpiece Classic's Emma adaptation (it aired on BBC One last year), written by Sandy Welch and directed by Jim O'Hanlon. It might not feature cell phones, smash cuts, or breakneck pacing, but this Emma is a pleasurable if slightly imperfect adaptation.

Airing as four installments in the UK, Emma will air over two weeks here in the States and the format allows screenwriter Welch to give the deftly comic plot time to breathe without rushing through the action. There's a somewhat painful/nostalgic opening that my wife and I dubbed "Emma Babies," which features our main characters in childhood scenes of heartbreak and loss, displaying a seriousness that's at odds with the comedy to come. While I didn't mind the sequence, I did find the use of narration slightly intrusive at times.

In this version, Romola Garai (Atonement) is Emma Woodhouse, the sweetly naive and well-off young woman whose penchant for matchmaking has thrown the little social circle of Highbury into chaos. While Garai captures the quick wit of Emma, her performance at times errs a little too much on the bratty side. There's definitely fire behind her banter with neighbor (and brother-in-law) Mr. Knightley (Eli Stone's Johnny Lee Miller) but I wanted her to be a bit more brazen and mentally acute. Garai is perfectly fine but I couldn't help shake the feeling that she lacks a certain je ne sais quoi that makes Austen's Emma such a pleasantly flawed character. Likewise, Miller's Knightley is perfectly serviceable but his performance doesn't quite capture the unexpected heat that develops between him and Emma.

Still, the plot itself unfolds in a leisurely and faithful manner, allowing the diverse cast to each get their moment in the sun as Austen targets the class constraints of Regency England with a precise eye. The colorful cast of characters assembled here includes Michael Gambon, Tamsin Greig, Laura Pyper, Jodhi May, Louise Dylan, Christina Cole, Blake Ritson, and Rupert Evans.

As always Emma's plot is straightforward: Emma yearns to create happiness for those around her but her mischief backfires several times over when she takes the even more naive Harriet Smith (Dylan) under her wing and sets about to match her with the village's dishy vicar (Ritson). And while Emma falls for the dashing Frank Churchill (Evans)--only to have her hopes dashed by a surprising twist--she slowly comes to learn that her truest match is the person who has goaded her into becoming the best possible version of herself.

While this Emma might not be as flashy or modern as its adaptation predecessors, there's still pleasure to be had in its comic grip and it offers perhaps the best way to wind down a weekend of modern-day excess. Or the continual mating rituals of human life, today still fraught with as much peril as they were in Austen's day.



Emma begins Sunday night at 9 pm on PBS' Masterpiece Classic. Check your local listings for details.

Comments

Bella Spruce said…
Clueless and McGrath's "Emma" are both pitch perfect but I am intrigued by this version too. I'm hoping that, because it's longer, we'll get to see a little more story and maybe a broader depth to some of the smaller characters. (No one will every be able to replace Jeremy Northam as Mr. Knightley, though!)
Anonymous said…
I think it is the Dirty Dancing: Havana Nights actress as Emma that I am having a hard time picturing in a Jane Austen work. Emma is by far my favorite and I typically like the BBC adaptations of Austen, so I will give it a try!

Popular posts from this blog

What's Done is Done: The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil on the Season Finale of "Lost"

Every story begins with thread. It's up to the storyteller to determine just how much they need to parcel out, what pattern they're making, and when to cut it short and tie it off. With last night's penultimate season finale of Lost ("The Incident, Parts One and Two"), written by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, we began to see the pattern that Lindelof and Cuse have been designing towards the last five seasons of this serpentine series. And it was only fitting that the two-hour finale, which pushes us on the road to the final season of Lost , should begin with thread, a loom, and a tapestry. Would Jack follow through on his plan to detonate the island and therefore reset their lives aboard Oceanic Flight 815 ? Why did Locke want to kill Jacob? What caused The Incident? What was in the box and just what lies in the shadow of the statue? We got the answers to these in a two-hour season finale that didn't quite pack the same emotional wallop of previous seas

Katie Lee Packs Her Knives: Breaking News from Bravo's "Top Chef"

The android has left the building. Or the test kitchen, anyway. Top Chef 's robotic host Katie Lee Joel, the veritable "Uptown Girl" herself (pictured at left), will NOT be sticking around for a second course of Bravo's hit culinary competition. According to a well-placed insider, Joel will "not be returning" to the show. No reason for her departure was cited. Unfortunately, the perfect replacement for Joel, Top Chef judge and professional chef Tom Colicchio, will not be taking over as the reality series' host (damn!). Instead, the show's producers are currently scouring to find a replacement for Joel. Top Chef 's second season was announced by Bravo last month, but no return date has been set for the series' ten-episode sophomore season. Stay tuned as this story develops. UPDATE (6/27): Bravo has now confirmed the above story .

Have a Burning Question for Team Darlton, Matthew Fox, Evangeline Lilly, or Michael Emerson?

Lost fans: you don't have to make your way to the island via Ajira Airways in order to ask a question of the creative team or the series' stars. Televisionary is taking questions from fans to put to Lost 's executive producers/showrunners Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse and stars Matthew Fox ("Jack Shephard"), Evangeline Lilly ("Kate Austen"), and Michael Emerson ("Benjamin Linus") for a series of on-camera interviews taking place this weekend. If you have a specific question for any of the above producers or actors from Lost , please leave it in the comments section below . I'll be accepting questions until midnight PT tonight and, while I can't promise I'll be able to ask any specific inquiry due to the brevity of these on-camera interviews, I am looking for some insightful and thought-provoking questions to add to the mix. So who knows: your burning question might get asked after all.