Skip to main content

Restaurant Wars: An Advance Review of Season Three of BBC America's "Last Restaurant Standing"

I've long been captivated by BBC America's culinary competition series, Last Restaurant Standing (a.k.a. The Restaurant in the UK), which returns with its third season tonight.

While Last Restaurant Standing returns tonight, the series is a slightly different beast than in its two previous iterations. While chef/restaurateur Raymond Blanc and judges Sarah Willingham and David Moore all return and the overall premise of the series--"couples" compete to open their own restaurant--remains the same, there's something slightly different going on here.

For one, Last Restaurant Standing's format has changed, reducing the episode count and sucking out some of the series' nail-biting tension. In the UK, previous seasons of the competition series aired twice a week, with one episode devoted to the couples running their individual restaurants, amid frequent complications sprung on them by Raymond Blanc, and the second devoted to the Challenge, a gauntlet of fire through which the worst-performing couples would be run and by which one couple would be eliminated.

The Challenge is, rather sadly, gone. I always thought that it was one of the more interesting arenas for the series, forcing the contestants to adapt to any situation (sometimes quite mad ones) and really think on their toes. It was a good metric for understanding just how adaptable, intelligent, and determined each of the couples were, pushing them even further out of their comfort zone and forcing them to come to accept the harsh realities of the restaurant business. After all, it's not just dinner parties and shopping for ingredients at farm stores.

In the two episodes provided for review by BBC America, the new version of Last Restaurant Standing therefore places much more emphasis on the overall concept of the couples' individual restaurants and on their skills on line and in front of house. However, it's hard to judge the week-to-week tension and drama of the series as the couples don't actually move into their restaurant spaces until Week Three.

But that's not to say that the couples aren't under a great deal of strain in the first two episodes, because they are. The first episode finds them more or less auditioning for Raymond Blanc himself, as they are put into teams of three couples and tasked with organizing a three-course menu, with each couple responsible for creating a dish (starter, main, or dessert) that sums up their restaurant's concept. The second installment has the couples working on the line in a three of Britain's high street chain restaurants. It's a task that proves that many of them are ill-equipped to be running a place of their own and several seem to have little understanding of the amount of diligence, organization, and hard work necessary to run an endeavor such as that.

And, yes, some of the contestants engage in behavior that is outright shocking. Mother and daughter team Sandy and Natalie's attempts to open cans using a very sharp chef's knife (rather than, you know, a can opener) is so jaw-dropping and terrifying that Raymond is forced to take action from the start and actually intervene before one of them loses a finger. It's an eye-opening start to the season and one that makes me question the sanity of several of these contestants. Did they really not know what they were getting into? Had they never seen the series before? What did they expect that they would be doing?

There are a few that are worth keeping an eye on. One couple in particular seems extremely strong while another has a restaurant concept that is quite original... and mind-boggling at the same time.

All in all, a good start for what promises to be a fun season of Last Restaurant Standing but which so far lacks the same level of spark and heat of the last two seasons. Still, I'll be tuning in every Tuesday night to see just who walks away with their own restaurant...

Season Three of Last Restaurant Standing premieres tonight at 9 pm ET/PT on BBC America.

Comments

Bella Spruce said…
I'm sad that this season will be shorter and that they are no longer doing the challenges. It was good to see the teams interact with each other and they always came up with challenges that were fun and interesting too. Oh, well.
Chris said…
I've already seen the season and it's very much off from the past two. A lot of the elements are there but the BBC budget cuts that must have happened behind the scenes really affected things. The lack of the Challenge really makes a difference. I'll be interested to read your take as the show progresses.

Popular posts from this blog

What's Done is Done: The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil on the Season Finale of "Lost"

Every story begins with thread. It's up to the storyteller to determine just how much they need to parcel out, what pattern they're making, and when to cut it short and tie it off. With last night's penultimate season finale of Lost ("The Incident, Parts One and Two"), written by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, we began to see the pattern that Lindelof and Cuse have been designing towards the last five seasons of this serpentine series. And it was only fitting that the two-hour finale, which pushes us on the road to the final season of Lost , should begin with thread, a loom, and a tapestry. Would Jack follow through on his plan to detonate the island and therefore reset their lives aboard Oceanic Flight 815 ? Why did Locke want to kill Jacob? What caused The Incident? What was in the box and just what lies in the shadow of the statue? We got the answers to these in a two-hour season finale that didn't quite pack the same emotional wallop of previous season

Pilot Inspektor: CBS' "Smith"

I may just have to change my original "What I'll Be Watching This Fall" post, as I sat down and finally watched CBS' new crime drama Smith this weekend. (What? It's taken me a long time to make my way through the stack of pilot DVDs.) While it's on following Gilmore Girls and Veronica Mars on Tuesday nights (10 pm ET/PT, to be exact), I'm going to be sure to leave enough room on my TiVo to make sure that I catch this compelling, amoral drama. While one can't help but be impressed by what might just be the most marquee-friendly cast in primetime--Ray Liotta, Virginia Madsen, Jonny Lee Miller, Amy Smart, Simon Baker, and Franky G all star and Shohreh Aghdashloo has a recurring role--the pilot's premise alone earned major points in my book: it's a crime drama from the point of view of the criminals, who engage in high-stakes heists. But don't be alarmed; it's nothing like NBC's short-lived Heist . Instead, think of it as The Italian

The Daily Beast: "How The Killing Went Wrong"

While the uproar over the U.S. version of The Killing has quieted, the show is still a pale imitation of the Danish series on which it is based. Over at The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "How The Killing Went Wrong," in which I look at how The Killing has handled itself during its second season, and compare it to the stunning and electrifying original Danish series, Forbrydelsen , on which it is based. (I recently watched all 20 episodes of Forbrydelsen over a few evenings.) The original is a mind-blowing and gut-wrenching work of genius. It’s not necessary to rehash the anger that followed in the wake of the conclusion last June of the first season of AMC’s mystery drama The Killing, based on Søren Sveistrup’s landmark Danish show Forbrydelsen, which follows the murder of a schoolgirl and its impact on the people whose lives the investigation touches upon. What followed were irate reviews, burnished with the “burning intensity of 10,000 white-hot suns